To Discuss Your Case Call Us Today 610-896-9909Committed to the passionate pursuit of your rightsScott M. Pollins Attorney At Law
HomeFirm OverviewAttorney ProfilePractice OverviewResource LinksContact Us

Employment Law News

News

[03/10] Unemployment benefit cuts, higher taxes projected
[03/10] Senate to pass jobless aid, business tax breaks
[03/09] Senate to take up unemployment insurance extension
[03/08] Allergan CEO got $11.1M in compensation in 2009
[03/08] Court will decide if NASA checks can continue

More...

Articles

Regulating Smoking at Work

Employers have a duty to provide a safe workplace for their employees. This means not only the equipment used by the employees but also the space they work in, including the quality of the air they breathe. While the federal government agency responsible for overseeing workplace safety, OSHA, has yet to declare smoking a hazard to a safe workplace, many states have stepped in and regulate smoking in the workplace. As scientific studies shed light on the dangers of secondhand smoke to nonsmokers, there is mounting public pressure to regulate smoking in areas of public use.

More...

Can At-Will Employees Bring Wrongful Discharge Claims?

At-will employment means that either the employee or the employer may end the employment relationship at any time, for any reason or no reason at all. All employment relationships are presumed to be at-will unless there is a contract between the employee and the employer stating a specific duration of employment. A contract that is for an indefinite period generally will be considered as creating an at-will employment relationship.

More...

Case Summaries

[03/09] San Francisco Hous. Auth. v. SEIU Local 790
Superior court's order vacating an arbitration award in its entirety on the ground that the the award is contrary to layoff provisions of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the parties is reversed as the remedy imposed by the arbitrator did not conflict with clear and explicit language of the MOU and it was rationally related to the breach identified.

[03/09] Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch.
In an employment discrimination and retaliation action brought by a teacher at a religious school claiming violations of the ADA, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on the "ministerial exception" is vacated and remanded as, given the factual findings relating to plaintiff's primary duties as a teacher, the district court erred in its legal conclusion classifying her as a ministerial employee.

[03/08] McBeth v. Himes
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action arising out of an investigation by the sheriff's office and the Colorado Department of Human Services that resulted in plaintiff surrendering her license to run a daycare facility in Colorado, partial summary judgment based on qualified immunity to defendant-officials is affirmed in part where: 1) plaintiff voluntarily relinquished her license before any suspension proceedings could take place; and 2) defendants made a prima facie showing that they acted objectively reasonably when they sought suspension of plaintiff's daycare license. However, the order is reversed in part where plaintiff failed to allege and prove that the state officials lacked cause to seek suspension of her license.

[03/05] Rhine v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am.
In a petition for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board under 33 U.S.C. section 921(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, the petition is denied where: 1) a reasonable mind could have concluded that the Pacific Maritime Association Average adequately represented petitioner's annual earning capacity; and 2) the availability of alternative employment was determined by reference to two criteria: the claimant's physical abilities and the economic availability of particular jobs in the market.

[03/05] Quasius v. Schwan Food Co.
In an employment discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where defendant failed to file a motion to withdraw his dispositive admissions after the district court provided ample notice and opportunity to do so.

More...

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there certain questions that an employer may not ask during a job interview?

When may an employee be entitled to medical leave from work?

How can an employee secure a reasonable accommodation for his or her disability by an employer?

How may an employer monitor employees in the workplace?

When is harassment illegal?

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Scott M. Pollins' law firm is located in southeastern Pennsylvania (Ardmore, Pennsylvania). Lawyer Scott Pollins assists clients in the Philadelphia-Main Line area, including the cities of Ardmore, Philadelphia, West Chester, Bryn Mawr, Haverford, Bala-Cynwyd, Villanova, Media, Doylestown, and Norristown, as well as Delaware County, Bucks County, Montgomery County, Chester County, and Philadelphia County in protecting their consumer rights.

Pennsylvania • New Jersey • Maryland